<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Open Source PC &#187; linux advocates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opensourcepc.net/tag/linux-advocates/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opensourcepc.net</link>
	<description>The lowest cost workstation on the planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:24:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why did Linux turn out to be a complete flop on the netbook?</title>
		<link>http://opensourcepc.net/why-did-linux-turn-out-to-be-a-complete-flop-on-the-netbook</link>
		<comments>http://opensourcepc.net/why-did-linux-turn-out-to-be-a-complete-flop-on-the-netbook#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linux Fan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux advocates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux operating systems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourcepc.net/?p=630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Linux advocates claimed that Linux would be a major player in the netbook market. Unfortunately, Linux turned out to be a complete flop, like it is in every market. Very few companies sell netbooks with Linux operating systems. 
Anyhow, why did Linux end in failure in the netbook market?





&#160;Mail this post


Technorati Tags: failure, Linux, linux [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://opensourcepc.net/why-did-linux-turn-out-to-be-a-complete-flop-on-the-netbook/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

